Jouni Malinen jkmaline
Wed Jun 16 21:59:51 PDT 2004

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 08:05:02AM +0200, Gunter Burchardt wrote:

> My first mail seems to be to huge for this mailing list.

Which is a good sign that separating the patch into couple of shorter
files might have been helpful.. ;-)

> Next patch is ready. It compiles/starts up/authenticates a client via
> 1x/deauthenticates it and shutdown. Im not able to test WPA. I had to
> change some calls in wpa.c for the new void *priv pointer. driver.c is
> nearly clean from hapd. hapd is only needed by debug-messages. We
> should add some defines for debugging in driver specific stuff without
> hapd in it!

Thanks! I merged most of it into CVS tree. Some cleanup was needed for
indentation and trailing white space etc., but other than that, I did
not too much changes. However, I dropped this part for now:

>  - function pointer for driver specific sta dump
>    (hostapd_dump_sta_state), moved this function to driver.c

driver.c should be low-level code and processing struct sta_info in it
does not sound a good direction. Actually, I ended up removing
struct sta_info completely from driver.c.

struct sta_info may need to be handled somewhat separately since
different driver interfaces might either share the same structure or
use their own (or have some kind of sub-structure within that
structure etc.).

Some of these changes removed some hapd uses from driver.c, but yes, the
remaining debug cases would benefit from some cleanup.

> Ok this patch has 1017 lines. I hope this is ok.

It was a bit long and partly because of this, it took me some time to
go through everything. In other words, smaller patch files would be

> Next step is to move hapd->sock to hapd->driver.data->sock. Therefor i
> move ieee802_1x_send_data() to a new file send.c . I will also add a
> function to send 802.11 management frames to send.c . driver_info get 
> 2 new function pointer for these functions.

OK. Please replace struct sta_info with u8 *addr (i.e., only sta->addr
is needed) when moving ieee802_1x_send_data(). In addition, that could
actually be renamed to ieee802_1x_send_eapol() (and something shorter,
like send_eapol for function pointer).

Btw, please use another thread and more descriptive subject line for
next patch. I have a bit too many messages in NEW state waiting and I
might miss something if the subject line does not describe the contents.
Including PATCH on the line could also be helpful for the same reason.

Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA

More information about the Hostap mailing list