[PATCH 0/2] PBL: constructor fixes
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed Aug 19 08:01:32 PDT 2026
On 2026-08-19 16:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/19/26 4:12 PM, Stefan Kerkmann wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann at pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Stefan Kerkmann (2):
> > ARM/ARM64/RISC-V: pbl: guard constructor support
> > ARM64: setup_c: abi safe link register storage
>
> if these are applied after what's in next, we would have intermittent
> breakage when doing a bisect right?
>
> I would suggest either turning these into fixups or just resend the
> whole series.
I just squashed them into the original commit. But next time, yes, you
can send --fixup patches for patches in next.
I just learned there's also --fixup=amend:<commit> for replacing the
original commit message along with the fixup. There's even
--fixup=reword:<commit> for just rewording the commit message without
changing the patch content.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list