[PATCH 0/2] Initial LS1021-IOT board support

[Renaud Barbier]

What about soc/fsl/immap_lsch2.h vs soc/fsl/immap_ls102xa.h.
Lots of similarities but also a lots of differences (when excluding the prefix LSCH2 and LS102XA)
Can I assume ccsr_scfg can be mapped to each other?
May be a question to NXP.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sascha Hauer <sha at pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 10 February 2023 12:26
> To: Renaud Barbier <Renaud.Barbier at ametek.com>
> Cc: Barebox List <barebox at lists.infradead.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Initial LS1021-IOT board support
> 
> ***NOTICE*** This came from an external source. Use caution when
> replying, clicking links, or opening attachments.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:54:31AM +0000, Renaud Barbier wrote:
> > I have not tried yet. I was not sure if you like to have separate machine
> support as there are some differences in the SOC .
> >
> > I will merge it and send you a new patch.
> 
> I like it better when it's merged, eventhough it's never compiled together as
> they are different compiler architectures.
> 
> Sascha
> 
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sascha Hauer <sha at pengutronix.de>
> > > Sent: 10 February 2023 11:26
> > > To: Renaud Barbier <Renaud.Barbier at ametek.com>
> > > Cc: Barebox List <barebox at lists.infradead.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Initial LS1021-IOT board support
> > >
> > > ***NOTICE*** This came from an external source. Use caution when
> > > replying, clicking links, or opening attachments.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:26:21PM +0000, Renaud Barbier wrote:
> > > > The LS1021A-IOT is NXP ARMv7 Layerscape evaluation board.
> > > >
> > > > These patches provide a basic board support with:
> > > >       - UART
> > > >       - boot from SPI
> > > >       - One Ethernet port - eth1*
> > > >
> > > > The content of the EEPROM having been lost so the MAC should be
> > > > set in the config file
> > > >
> > > > The code is ported from NXP U-boot 2021-04. Like U-boot, the
> > > > machine support i.e mac-lxxx lives in its own directory. However,
> > > > it is very similar to the ls1046a machine support. This migth be
> > > > merged. Please
> > > advise.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to have this merged to arch/arm/mach-layerscape.
> > > For example arch/arm/mach-layerscape/pblimage.c looks identical to
> > > your version.
> > >
> > > Have you tried merging it? If yes, which problems did you encounter?
> > >
> > > Sascha
> > >
> > > --
> > > Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> > > Steuerwalder Str. 21                       |
> > >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.pengutronix.de/__;!!HKOSU0g!C
> > > ZdG8RU9gQpSVfJzH_T4b8q5lFRdLrpGiJsD5H-
> > > H351N8ycvCriKuoi6quenVmESFrbU0Iw9qhIlb5z4ifTE$   |
> > > 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> > > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> >
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21                       |
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.pengutronix.de/__;!!HKOSU0g!G
> os0mqldKVyCzyhvalaS58FEkUQ1osWODWWtH0-
> MC4aIxC0d2rtcUzK3DWcfHooti_U0whPPLXjo8H3Xl87E$   |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |