[PATCH v2] ARM: i.MX: sabresd: Add support for i.MX6QP board variant

[Lucas Stach]

Am Donnerstag, dem 15.04.2021 um 17:12 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:59:30PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 15.04.2021 um 16:03 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> > > The SabreSD comes with different SoC variants. This patch adds support
> > > for the i.MX6QP based board. the DCD data has been taken from U-Boot
> > > 2021.04
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > [...]
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..52cc8aa73b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx6qp-sabresd.dts
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> > > + * Copyright 2011 Linaro Ltd.
> > > + *
> > > + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> > > + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > > + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
> > > + *
> > > + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
> > > + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <arm/imx6qp-sabresd.dts>
> > > +
> > > +/ {
> > > +	model = "Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Smart Device Board";
> > > +	compatible = "fsl,imx6q-sabresd", "fsl,imx6q";
> > 
> > I'm not sure I like this overwriting of the compatible string. AFAICS
> > we don't have any instances for "fsl,imx6qp" compatible checks in
> > either Barebox or Linux kernel, so it shouldn't cause any immediate
> > damage, but this still feels wrong.
> 
> It's overwritten with the same strings as the included upstream dts has.
> Anyway, as you say overwriting them here seems wrong. I removed it.

You had me confused for bit here, so I just checked and the compatible
in the included upstream dts is different, as expected:

compatible = "fsl,imx6qp-sabresd", "fsl,imx6qp";

So now that you removed those lines, does you board file need fixing
for the different compatibles?

Regards,
Lucas