[PATCH] net/e1000: fix driver probing in the presence of two e1000 devices
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed Jan 17 00:03:01 PST 2018
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:03:26AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The .id member of the struct device for the invm device is not
> initialized and so implicitly zero. This yields:
>
> register_device: already registered invm0
>
> for the second i210 during probe.
>
> So use the parent's id to initialize the id for invm, too, as is already
> done for the corresponding e1000-nor device.
>
> Fixes: a74b97f009c6 ("e1000: Expose i210's iNVM as a cdev")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
Applied, thanks
Sascha
> ---
> drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
> index 23fb05ec72bc..748d8afe7922 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
> @@ -1504,6 +1504,7 @@ int e1000_register_invm(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> return ret;
>
> strcpy(hw->invm.dev.name, "invm");
> + hw->invm.dev.id = hw->dev->id;
> hw->invm.dev.parent = hw->dev;
> ret = register_device(&hw->invm.dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list