[RFC, PATCH v2 2/3] net: add ar231x-eth support
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Tue May 28 02:57:20 EDT 2013
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:57:02PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 24.05.2013 09:09, schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:49:48AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> >>This driver should work with some Atheros WiSoCs:
> >>- ar2312, ar2313
> >>- ar2315, ar2316 ...
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de>
> >>---
> >> drivers/net/Kconfig | 7 +
> >> drivers/net/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/net/ar231x.c | 429 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/net/ar231x.h | 219 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 656 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ar231x.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ar231x.h
> >>
> >>+
> >>+ /* FIXME: priv->{t,r}x_ring are virtual addresses,
> >>+ * use virt-to-phys convertion */
> >
> >We use 1:1 mappings, so I think this comment should be removed.
>
> This part should be fixed after Anthonys "MIPS: add initial cache support"
>
> >>+
> >>+static void ar231x_allocate_dma_descriptors(struct eth_device *edev)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct ar231x_eth_priv *priv = edev->priv;
> >>+ u16 ar231x_descr_size = sizeof(struct ar231x_descr);
> >>+ u16 i;
> >>+
> >>+ priv->tx_ring = xmalloc(ar231x_descr_size);
> >
> >What alignment do you need here? This may or may not be safe.
>
> Currently there is no other choice.
>
> >>+
> >>+static int ar231x_eth_recv(struct eth_device *edev)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct ar231x_eth_priv *priv = edev->priv;
> >>+
> >>+ while (1) {
> >>+ struct ar231x_descr *rxdsc = priv->next_rxdsc;
> >>+ u32 status = rxdsc->status;
> >>+
> >>+ /* owned by DMA? */
> >>+ if (status & DMA_RX_OWN)
> >>+ break;
> >>+
> >>+ /* Pick only packets what we can handle:
> >>+ * - only complete packet per buffer
> >>+ * (First and Last at same time)
> >>+ * - drop multicast */
> >>+ if (!priv->kill_rx_ring &&
> >>+ ((status & DMA_RX_MASK) == DMA_RX_FSLS)) {
> >>+ u16 length =
> >>+ ((status >> DMA_RX_LEN_SHIFT) & 0x3fff)
> >>+ - CRC_LEN;
> >>+ net_receive((void *)rxdsc->buffer_ptr, length);
> >>+ }
> >>+ /* Clean descriptor. now it is owned by DMA. */
> >>+ priv->next_rxdsc = (struct ar231x_descr *)rxdsc->next_dsc_ptr;
> >>+ ar231x_flash_rxdsc(rxdsc);
> >>+ }
> >
> >This loop looks wrong. You should only receive a single packet for each
> >call of this function.
>
> This loop is needed to filter broadcast packtes. If remove this loop
> and reduce rx buffer, i will get really bad packet losses.
What I meant is that you should only pull a single packet out of the
queue each time you enter ar231x_eth_recv. You shouldn't have to reduce
the rx buffer for this.
Anyway, thinking about it it should be fine to call net_receive on all
currently available buffers like you did above. Just keep it like it is
now.
So with the request_mem_region fix this driver should be fine.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list