[PATCH 0/7] Basic support for Marvell Armada 370/XP SoC
Jason Cooper
jason at lakedaemon.net
Sat May 4 14:34:14 EDT 2013
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Jason Cooper,
>
> On Sat, 4 May 2013 13:15:30 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
>
> > Great work! Very clean series. I only have one thought. Prafulla
> > (u-boot kirkwood maintainer) is always asking about consolidating the
> > kwbimage.cfg files. The three you've submitted for the first three
> > boards are almost (if not entirely) identical. Before a whole bunch of
> > boards get added, should we make a kwbimage-common.cfg or similar?
>
> I'm not sure I want to make the configuration language more complicated
> than it is already. It's already a pain to parse such a configuration
> file in C (I would have preferred to write the kwbimage tool in Python,
> but since all existing Barebox tools are in C, I wasn't sure a Python
> tool would have been accepted). Adding the support for includes means
> that you have to recursively handle includes, etc. I'm not sure I want
> to go down this road for files that typically have between 10 to 30
> lines.
Agreed.
> > I'm not sold on the idea, I'm just mentioning it since it's been an
> > issue in the past. If we want to do that, now would be the time.
>
> I don't agree: we can refactor those files at any point in time. For
> now, I don't think it's very useful, but in the future, if it turns out
> to be useful and someone feels that it is important to improve this, we
> can always refactor the .cfg files.
Ok, no problem. I just wanted to make sure it was considered before we
went all gung-ho adding boards.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the barebox
mailing list