how easy to add extra config for NAND-less beagle?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Nov 15 11:39:58 EST 2012
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:36:37AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > returning to playing with barebox after lengthy hiatus and i asked
> > an equivalent question on the u-boot list, let's see if it's relevant
> > here.
> > i did a regular configure and build for my beagle xM (rev C) which,
> > unlike the beagle classic, has no NAND flash:
> > $ make omap3530_beagle_xload_defconfig ; make
> > $ make omap3530_beagle_defconfig ; make
> > then copied MLO and barebox.bin to an appropriate card and, lo, it
> > booted nicely and i'm currently sitting in barebox:
> > barebox at Texas Instrument's Beagle:/ version
> > barebox 2012.10.0-00283-gd65d9df #2 Thu Nov 15 06:45:21 EST 2012
> > thing is, this build has a good deal of NAND-related functionality
> > that is of no use whatsoever on the current beagle xMs, so i'm
> > interested in how little work it would take to add an extra config
> > that would deselect everything related to NAND. (obviously, having
> > that functionality there doesn't *hurt*, but i'm planning to use
> > barebox in my new embedded linux courses and it would be nice to be
> > able to build for an xM and have it *totally* correspond to the actual
> > hardware.) it shouldn't be hard -- simply deselecting anything
> > related to NAND, MTD or JFFS2 should do the trick.
> Disable MTD support and if you want also the protect/erase commands:
> make menuconfig
> Drivers --->
> [ ] Memory Technology Device (MTD) support --->
> commands --->
> flash --->
> [ ] protect/erase
> Saves you around 35Kb of binary space
yup, i'm testing that shortly, but my question was more along the
lines of, rather than having to disable all NAND-related
functionality *manually*, how easy/worthwhile would it be to create an
additional make target that reflects a beagle *without* NAND flash?
one significant difference between a classic beagle and a current xM
is the total lack of NAND flash, and that's not a minor difference.
it means you can remove all barebox functionality related to that --
NAND routines and support, MTD stuff, JFFS2(?) support, and so on.
this could be automated by creating a couple new configs, say:
so that the result really matches the underlying board.
is this worth doing? it would seem to be fairly easy, i can whip
something up and test it.
p.s. there are other significant differences as well -- onboard
ethernet, 4-port USB hub. it seems to me that there is enough of a
difference to warrant a separate configuration. thoughts?
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
More information about the barebox