[PATCH 0/2] Y-Modem implementation change
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Thu Nov 1 13:50:49 EDT 2012
On 18:37 Thu 01 Nov , Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> This patchset aims at changing the Y-Modem protocol implementation.
> You have already seen the RFC version, this is the next version, which :
> - provides a much more tested version
> - is ready for review
> The following comments have been taken into account :
> - Antony: testing on a serial line
> - Sascha: split between protocol and commands
> - Jean-Christophe: kermit protocol change
> So before doing the real review, could I ask of you :
> - Antony: could you redo your test over a serial line by applying only
> the first patch so that you can compare loady and loady2 ?
> Don't use "loady2 -g", as Y-Modem/G protocol requires a
> lossless line (USB), and a serial line cannot guarantee it.
> - Sascha: does the split command/protocol suit you ?
> - Jean-Christophe: I left the loadb implementation as it is. The goal
> of the patch is to change X-Modem and Y-Modem(G)
> implementation, not kermit. Could you test that I
> have not created a regression of loadb ?
I'll prefer to have a new command named xyz so we have no confusion between
loadb and the new one
More information about the barebox