Antwort: Re: flash image through CAN

[Robert Schwebel]

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:06:09AM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 09:50 AM, christian.buettner at rafi.de wrote:
> > what is the effort to port the CAN stack to barebox?
>
> Definitely more than implementing the "boot a minimal Linux (2-3 MB) and
> do the update process there". And more error prone, for the minimal
> update Linux basically we have all components (Kernel, CAN-Stack,
> minimal Userspace).

It is just a matter of how much flash you have on the system. If there
is enough space, I'd always go for a Linux based solution.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/attachments/20120209/9aa5a320/attachment.sig>