any value in allowing user selection of barebox prompt?
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Tue Feb 7 06:56:18 EST 2012
On 06:13 Tue 07 Feb , Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:57:22AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ... snip ...
> > > i tried it and it seems to work fine although the aesthetics in
> > > "make menuconfig" is a bit strange WRT order:
> > >
> > > (Texas Instrument's Beagle) Board info
> > > Select OMAP board (Texas Instrument's Beagle Board) --->
> > >
> > > but that could be fixed just by moving the BOARDINFO entry below the
> > > board choice in that file.
> > >
> > > was this already discussed and rejected once upon a time? it's not
> > > a big deal but it has the value of being moderately informative.
> > It hasn't been discussed before. It's mostly the way it is because I
> > did it that way without much thinking. The change you suggest has
> > one drawback. Consider you do a make menuconfig and change the
> > board. Currently BOARDINFO correctly changes to the new board, but
> > if we prompt the user for BOARDINFO the board string will still have
> > the name of the old board.
> i'd noticed that but didn't know if there was any way to resolve
> it easily.
add set support to Kconfig
More information about the barebox