[PATCH 1/9] kfifo: introduce kfifo_dump_str to dump the fifo
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Mon Dec 17 02:23:18 EST 2012
On 23:49 Fri 14 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:40:02PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > This will allow to implement a dmesg mecanism in barebox
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> > ---
> > include/kfifo.h | 2 ++
> > lib/kfifo.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/kfifo.h b/include/kfifo.h
> > index 25880f4..9dbbe0d 100644
> > --- a/include/kfifo.h
> > +++ b/include/kfifo.h
> > @@ -74,5 +74,7 @@ static inline unsigned int kfifo_len(struct kfifo *fifo)
> > void kfifo_putc(struct kfifo *fifo, unsigned char c);
> > unsigned int kfifo_getc(struct kfifo *fifo, unsigned char *c);
> >
> > +void kfifo_dump_str(struct kfifo *fifo, void (*dump)(unsigned char c));
> > +
> > #endif
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/kfifo.c b/lib/kfifo.c
> > index afd3894..7892aed 100644
> > --- a/lib/kfifo.c
> > +++ b/lib/kfifo.c
> > @@ -154,3 +154,24 @@ unsigned int kfifo_getc(struct kfifo *fifo, unsigned char *c)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +void kfifo_dump_str(struct kfifo *fifo, void (*dump)(unsigned char c))
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + unsigned char *c;
> > + unsigned int l;
> > + unsigned int len;
> > +
> > + len = fifo->in - fifo->out;
> > +
> > + /* first get the data from fifo->out until the end of the buffer */
> > + l = min(len, fifo->size - (fifo->out & (fifo->size - 1)));
> > + c = fifo->buffer + (fifo->out & (fifo->size - 1));
> > + for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
> > + dump(c[i]);
> > +
> > + /* then get the rest (if any) from the beginning of the buffer */
> > + c = fifo->buffer;
> > + l = len - l;
> > + for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
> > + dump(c[i]);
> > +}
>
> This function works in the innards of the fifo implementation and
> replaces these two lines of code:
>
> while (kfifo_getc(console_output_fifo, &ch) == 0)
> console_putc(CONSOLE_STDOUT, ch);
>
> You do not provide a reason why we should do this, so: no.
the current code empty the fifo
this new function just dump it
so you can recall it
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the barebox
mailing list