apparent inconsistency in barebox doc content

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at
Tue Dec 4 07:13:42 EST 2012

  i'm not familiar with the in-barebox documentation (the "@brief" and
"@return" stuff), i'm assuming that's similar to kerneldoc, yes?  so
this snippet in arch/arm/boards/beagle/board.c doesn't look right:

,... snip ...
 * @return void
static int beagle_board_init(void)
... snip ...

  am i right in concluding there's a mismatch there?  and should i
flag anywhere else i run across mismatches like that?



Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA


More information about the barebox mailing list