apparent inconsistency in barebox doc content
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Tue Dec 4 07:13:42 EST 2012
i'm not familiar with the in-barebox documentation (the "@brief" and
"@return" stuff), i'm assuming that's similar to kerneldoc, yes? so
this snippet in arch/arm/boards/beagle/board.c doesn't look right:
,... snip ...
* @return void
static int beagle_board_init(void)
... snip ...
am i right in concluding there's a mismatch there? and should i
flag anywhere else i run across mismatches like that?
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
More information about the barebox