*** PROBABLY SPAM *** [PATCH 4/7] at91sam9260_devices: add flag to change ETX{2,3} pincfg on add_device_eth

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Fri Dec 9 09:56:01 EST 2011


On 12:28 Fri 09 Dec     , Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c |    9 +++++++--
please update all soc
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
> index 177f770..be1fdd9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
> @@ -63,8 +63,13 @@ void at91_add_device_eth(struct at91_ether_platform_data *data)
>  		at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA25, 0);	/* ERX2 */
>  		at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA26, 0);	/* ERX3 */
>  		at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA27, 0);	/* ERXCK */
> -		at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA23, 0);	/* ETX2 */
> -		at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA24, 0);	/* ETX3 */
> +		if (data->flags & AT91SAM_ETX2_ETX3_ALTERNATIVE) {
I really don't like the idea to propagate pin configuration to the drivers
this show stay at board or soc config level

I prefer to add a new parameter than use a flag use by the driver
please make this more generic alt_config1 as this will what is going to be use
by the pinctrl on at91

Best Regards,
J.



More information about the barebox mailing list