[PATCH] ARM i.MX27: initialize MAX
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Fri Dec 9 06:29:53 EST 2011
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:46:31AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 09:06 Fri 09 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:24:33PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > On 10:17 Thu 08 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/imx27-regs.h | 1 +
> > > > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > do we really need this in barebox?
> >
> > Why not? It's basically just a handfull of register accesses which are
> > normally hidden in lowlevel_init without anybody noticing it. The fact
> > that I created defines for them just makes it slightly more visible.
> can we have a small comment when they are needed at list
What do you mean? The patch has this:
> +/*
> + * Initialize MAX on i.MX27. necessary to give the DMA engine
> + * higher priority to the memory than the CPU. Needed for proper
> + * audio support
> + */
(I agree that this does not necessarily has to be done in barebox, but
my plan is to send a patch for the kernel aswell. This increases the
chance that it is done at least once somewhere)
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list