[PATCH] ARM i.MX27: initialize MAX
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Fri Dec 9 03:06:52 EST 2011
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:24:33PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 10:17 Thu 08 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/imx27-regs.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> do we really need this in barebox?
Why not? It's basically just a handfull of register accesses which are
normally hidden in lowlevel_init without anybody noticing it. The fact
that I created defines for them just makes it slightly more visible.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list