barebox for leopardboard
premi at ti.com
Mon Feb 8 05:41:52 EST 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: barebox-bounces at lists.infradead.org
> [mailto:barebox-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
> Tyler W. Wilson
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 11:29 PM
> To: barebox at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: barebox for leopardboard
> On 2/5/2010 1:49 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Tyler,
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:25:28PM -0400, Tyler W. Wilson wrote:
> >> I am curious if anybody has done any work on getting
> barebox running on
> >> the leopardboard, so I do not reproduce effort.
> >> I am especially interested in setting up a bootloader that directly
> >> supports USB and DFU, so that I do not need to use the
> UART/serial port.
> > I know nothing about the leopardboard, from googling I
> found out that
> > this is a beagleboard with a camera connected to it, right?
> Barebox runs
> > on the beagleboard, but unfortunately we do not have USB
> support for it.
> > You would have to port the usb driver for it, then DFU should work.
> > As a first shot you can compile the beagleboard defconfig
> and see how
> > far you get.
> > Sascha
> Unfortunately, it is a little different - it uses a DaVinci DM355
> processor, which is an ARM9 + custom DSP. The beagleboard
> uses an OMAP3x
> of course. Unfortunately, even I am confused on the TI naming
> scheme as
> to what is an OMAP versus what is a DaVinci.
> I will probably do as you suggest - start with the
> beagleboard configs
> and also look at the leopardboard code in the ti u-boot repo.
> that will give me enough data to get the basic barebox running.
You may want to post specific queries to davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com
> The USB worries me, since I am just familiar enough with it
> to know how
> complex it can be. Time will tell.
> Thank you for your input.
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
More information about the barebox