[PATCH 01/13] ath10k: introduce dynamic WMI structures
Michal Kazior
michal.kazior at tieto.com
Thu Sep 26 05:03:17 EDT 2013
On 26 September 2013 10:54, Kalle Valo <kvalo at qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Bartosz Markowski <bartosz.markowski at tieto.com> writes:
>
>> This is the initial framework to implement dynamic
>> WMI API in order to support new firmware (from so
>> called 10.X branch)
>>
>> The realization is to have a static WMI cmd map for
>> each of the firmwares, registered upom wmi init.
>>
>> This patch creates such map for MAIN FW, updates
>> wmi_cmd_send() calls to take as a parameter
>> the map value instead of direct WMI enum.
>>
>> As soon as complete 10.X API will be on place,
>> we will introduce the FW IE mechanics to dynamicaly
>> identify which FW is being used and based on that
>> we will use correct map, API, structures, etc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Markowski <bartosz.markowski at tieto.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -1293,7 +1438,8 @@ int ath10k_wmi_pdev_resume_target(struct ath10k *ar)
>> if (skb == NULL)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - return ath10k_wmi_cmd_send(ar, skb, WMI_PDEV_RESUME_CMDID);
>> + return ath10k_wmi_cmd_send(ar, skb,
>> + ar->wmi.cmd->wmi_pdev_resume_cmdid);
>> }
>
> I was thinking of adding a macro WMI_PDEV_RESUME_CMDID(ar) for all
> dynamic wmi ids, that way it would look as closely as possible with the
> original code. But I'm not sure if that makes sense anymore. Thoughts?
Seems like an unnecessary indirection to me. You still need to have
the mapping structure, unless you want to use macro concatenation (##)
instead.
Michał.
More information about the ath10k
mailing list