[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: Add broadcom-bluetooth

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Loic,

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> Add binding document for serial bluetooth chips using
> Broadcom protocol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain at gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: dt-bindings as separate patch
>     rebase on upcoming pi3 dts changes
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c51ea1b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +Broadcom Bluetooth Chips
> +---------------------
> +
> +This documents the binding structure and common properties for serial
> +attached Broadcom devices.
> +
> +Serial attached Broadcom devices shall be a child node of the host UART
> +device the slave device is attached to.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> + - compatible: should contain one of the following:
> +   * "brcm,bcm43438-bt"
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> + - max-speed: see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/slave-device.txt
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +&uart2 {
> +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> +       pinctrl-0 = <&uart2_pins>;
> +
> +       bluetooth {
> +               compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt";
> +               max-speed = <921600>;
> +       };
> +};

Thanks a lot for working on that, I've made a similar attempt a few
weeks ago but didn't manage to get it to work.

The way it's hooked in our boards is a bit more complex though, even
if it could be because we're using a different part.

In order to get it running we need:
  - two clocks, called in the broadcom datasheets lpo and tcxo.
  - three GPIOs, device wakeup, host wakeup and a shutdown GPIO (which
    might be the BT_ON you were discussing about)
  - two regulators called vbat and reg-en for us (I guess they're
    meant to power the chip, and its registers)

Do you know if you're also using those? Or could it be that it's just
hardwired to some non-gatable crystal / regulator on the RPI?

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rpi-kernel/attachments/20170822/25b56697/attachment.sig>