[PATCH 2/3] i2c: bcm2835: Add support for combined write-read transfer
Noralf Trønnes
noralf at tronnes.org
Tue Sep 20 01:41:15 PDT 2016
Den 20.09.2016 09:19, skrev Martin Sperl:
> Hi Noralf!
>
> On 19.09.2016 17:26, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>> Some SMBus protocols use Repeated Start Condition to switch from write
>> mode to read mode. Devices like MMA8451 won't work without it.
>>
>> When downstream implemented support for this in i2c-bcm2708, it broke
>> support for some devices, so a module parameter was added and combined
>> transfer was disabled by default.
>> See https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/599
>> It doesn't seem to have been any investigation into what the problem
>> really was. Later there was added a timeout on the polling loop.
>>
>> One of the devices mentioned to partially stop working was DS1307.
>>
>> I have run thousands of transfers to a DS1307 (rtc), MMA8451 (accel)
>> and AT24C32 (eeprom) in parallel without problems.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf at tronnes.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c | 107
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> ...
>> @@ -209,8 +289,17 @@ static int bcm2835_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter
>> *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
>> int i;
>> int ret = 0;
>> + /* Combined write-read to the same address (smbus) */
>> + if (num == 2 && (msgs[0].addr == msgs[1].addr) &&
>> + !(msgs[0].flags & I2C_M_RD) && (msgs[1].flags & I2C_M_RD) &&
>> + (msgs[0].len <= 16)) {
>> + ret = bcm2835_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[0], &msgs[1]);
>> +
>> + return ret ? ret : 2;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>> - ret = bcm2835_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[i]);
>> + ret = bcm2835_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[i], NULL);
>> if (ret)
>> break;
>> }
> This does not seem to implement the i2c_msg api correctly.
>
> As per comments in include/uapi/linux/i2c.h on line 58 only the last
> message
> in a group should - by default - send a STOP.
>
Apparently it's a known problem that the i2c controller doesn't support
Repeated Start. It will always issue a Stop when it has transferred DLEN
bytes.
Refs:
http://www.circuitwizard.de/raspi-i2c-fix/raspi-i2c-fix.html
http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/31728/has-anyone-successfully-used-i2c-repeated-starts-on-the-pi2-my-scope-says-they
UNLESS: a Start Transfer (ST) is issued after Transfer Active (TA) is set
and before DONE is set (or the last byte is shifted, I don't know excatly).
Refs:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/254#issuecomment-15254134
https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=807834&sid=2b612c7209f2175bf1a266359c72ae6c#p807834
I found this answer/report by joan that the downstream combined support
isn't reliable:
http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/31728/has-anyone-successfully-used-i2c-repeated-starts-on-the-pi2-my-scope-says-they
My implementation differs from downstream in that I use local_irq_save()
to protect the polling loop. But that only protects from missing the TA
(downstream can miss the TA and issue a Stop).
So currently in mainline we have a driver that says it support the standard
(I2C_FUNC_I2C), but it really only supports one message transfers since it
can't do ReStart.
What I have done in this patch is to support ReStart for transfers with
2 messages: first write, then read. But maybe a better solution is to just
leave this alone if it is flaky and use bitbanging instead. I don't know.
Noralf.
> As far as I understand you would need to implement the I2C_M_STOP flag
> (by exposing I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING in bcm2835_i2c_func)
> to make this work correctly:
>
> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + bool send_stop = (i == num - 1) ||msgs[i]
> <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=msg>->flags
> <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=flags> &I2C_M_STOP
> <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=I2C_M_STOP>;
> - ret = bcm2835_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[i]);
> + ret = bcm2835_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[i], send_stop);
> if (ret)
> break;
> }
>
> The corresponding device driver (or userspace) will need to set the
> flag correctly.
>
> Martin
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel
mailing list