[PATCH 1/3 v5] dt/bindings: Add binding for the BCM2835 mailbox driver
Jassi Brar
jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 21:53:53 PDT 2015
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 04/29/15 10:39, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>
>> Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 04/28/2015 02:44 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Craig McGeachie <slapdau at yahoo.com.au>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
>>>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v2: Split into a separate patch for submitting to the devicetree list.
>>>> Consistently start node docs with a capital letter. device's
>>>> address in the example shouldn't have "0x". Drop machine-specific
>>>> interrupt numbers from the docs. (changes by anholt).
>>>>
>>>> v3: Move the file to just bcm2835-mbox.txt, clean up formatting
>>>> (changes by anholt, from review by Lee Jones).
>>>>
>>>> v4: Move file back by consensus from various Broadcom platform
>>>> maintainers (changes by anholt, acked by Lee Jones).
>>>>
>>>> v5: Document that the mailbox cell should be 0 in clients, and add an
>>>> example of a client (changes by anholt, from review by Jassi).
>>>
>>>
>>> Some mention of what you changed in the patch might be nice, since it
>>> was originally authored by someone else, and there's quite a changelog.
>>
>>
>> I've been taking this changelog stuff out of the patch and putting it
>> below '---' because when I was submitting this series before, I got
>> chided for putting it in the patch!
>
>
> A changelog and a description of the changes you've made aren't quite the
> same thing.
>
> There should be some mention in the commit description of what you changed
> relative to the patch that someone else authored, so they don't get
> blaimed/praised for any of your changes. The format of that description
> wouldn't usually be a detailed patch revision changelog though, just a
> description of the overall changes that were left in the final version.
>
>>>> diff --git
>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/brcm,bcm2835-mbox.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/brcm,bcm2835-mbox.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>> +- #mbox-cells: Specifies the number of cells needed to encode a mailbox
>>>> + channel. The value shall be 1. Clients should supply
>>>> a value
>>>> + of 0 for the mailbox channel, because there is only
>>>> one
>>>> + exposed
>>>
>>>
>>> Can't you use #mbox-cells = <0> if there's no data to provide?
>>
>>
>> of_mbox_index_xlate looks like it's always dereferencing the first arg.
>
>
> Is it possible to fix that?
>
The driver specific of_xlate() is meant to be provided during
mbox_controller_register() in which case the default 1-cell xlate
won't be used.
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel
mailing list