[PATCH v5 8/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add isp0 node for rk3399

[Helen Koike]

Thank you Tomasz and Robin for your comments,

On 10/14/20 1:43 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:27 PM Helen Koike <helen.koike at collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On 9/26/20 10:00 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> Hi Helen,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:55:32PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
>>>> From: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq at rock-chips.com>
>>>>
>>>> RK3399 has two ISPs, but only isp0 was tested.
>>>> Add isp0 node in rk3399 dtsi
>>>>
>>>> Verified with:
>>>> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq at rock-chips.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <jacob2.chen at rock-chips.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike at collabora.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> V4:
>>>> - update clock names
>>>>
>>>> V3:
>>>> - clean up clocks
>>>>
>>>> V2:
>>>> - re-order power-domains property
>>>>
>>>> V1:
>>>> This patch was originally part of this patchset:
>>>>
>>>>     https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10267431/
>>>>
>>>> The only difference is:
>>>> - add phy properties
>>>> - add ports
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>>> index dba9641947a3a..ed8ba75dbbce8 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>>> @@ -1721,6 +1721,31 @@ vopb_mmu: iommu at ff903f00 {
>>>>              status = "disabled";
>>>>      };
>>>>
>>>> +    isp0: isp0 at ff910000 {
>>>> +            compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-cif-isp";
>>>> +            reg = <0x0 0xff910000 0x0 0x4000>;
>>>> +            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 43 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>>>> +            clocks = <&cru SCLK_ISP0>,
>>>> +                     <&cru ACLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>,
>>>> +                     <&cru HCLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>;
>>>> +            clock-names = "isp", "aclk", "hclk";
>>>> +            iommus = <&isp0_mmu>;
>>>> +            phys = <&mipi_dphy_rx0>;
>>>> +            phy-names = "dphy";
>>>> +            power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_ISP0>;
>>>
>>> Should this have status = "disabled" too? The mipi_dphy_rx0 node is
>>> disabled by default too, so in the default configuration the driver
>>> would always fail to probe.
>>
>> I'm thinking what is the overall guideline here.
>> Since isp and mipi_dphy are always present in the rk3399, shouldn't they always be enabled?
>> Or since they are only useful if a sensor is present, we should let the dts of the board to
>> enable it?
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion. I'm fine with enabling both by default
> as well, as it shouldn't hurt.
> 
> That said, I recall some alternative CIF IP block being present on
> this SoC as well (and patches posted recently), which AFAIR can't be
> activated at the same time as the ISP, so perhaps both of the
> alternatives should be disabled by default?
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
> 

Based on these two last emails, I think it make sense to disable them by default.

I'll just wait for feedback on patch 5/9 to submit an updated version.

Thanks
Helen