[PATCH v6 00/15] Add basic clocks and resets for JHB100 SoC
Jerome Brunet
jbrunet at baylibre.com
Mon Oct 12 12:16:19 PDT 2026
On 2026-10-12 20:03 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > > The JHB100 SoC includes CRG (Clock and Reset Generator) for multiple
> > > subsystems:
> >
> > Nothing really forces you to send them all together.
> >
> > In the future, could you try to send one CRG driver at a time ?
> >
> > It is fine to send big RFC to give context but after that, if you
> > can make you series smaller, it is generally a good idea to do so.
> >
> > This helps us iterate on the series faster and then you can fold our
> > feedback in following series (instead of repeating the same comments
> > on multiple instances of the same thing) Thanks.
> >
>
> > Also your series does not apply on clk-next or -rc1 and no pre-requisite
> > are mentioned in this cover letter. Consider using b4 to point out
> > your pre-requisite if any
>
> The dep should be the PR I sent to Brian, but I suspect what's happened
> here is that the MAINTAINERS parts of those patches (which I had dropped
> because they were all conflicting with my tree) didn't get reabsorbed
> into this series. Very annoying for review of course, even if it's a
> non-functional conflict. Of course rebase on top of clk-next would've
> highlighted that to the submitter!
Yes it was only the MAINTAINERS file which I did rebase to check if the rest
applied correctly.
--
Jerome
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list