[PATCH v7 15/24] ACPI: property: Add support for cells property
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Wed Jul 2 04:39:20 PDT 2025
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 02:37:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:20:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 7:16 AM Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
...
> > > static int acpi_fwnode_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > > const char *propname, const char *nargs_prop,
> > > unsigned int args_count, unsigned int index,
>
> > > const struct acpi_device_data *data;
> > > struct fwnode_handle *ref_fwnode;
> > > struct acpi_device *device;
> > > + unsigned int nargs_count;
> > > int ret, idx = 0;
>
> > > + nargs_count = acpi_fwnode_get_args_count(device, nargs_prop);
> >
> > I think it should work the same way as it used to for the callers that
> > pass args_count, so maybe
> >
> > if (!args_count)
> > args_count = acpi_fwnode_get_args_count(device, nargs_prop);
>
> But this is different variable.
>
> > > element++;
> > > -
> > > ret = acpi_get_ref_args(idx == index ? args : NULL,
> > > acpi_fwnode_handle(device),
> > > - &element, end, args_count);
> > > + &element, end,
> > > + nargs_count ? nargs_count : args_count);
> >
> > And this change would not be necessary?
>
> This is not the same check as proposed above.
> But this can be made shorter with Elvis in use:
>
> &element, end, nargs_count ?: args_count);
>
> > And analogously below.
>
> And below. And in case if there is a new proposal to have
>
> if (!nargs_count)
I meant
if (!nargs_prop)
here of course.
> args_count = acpi_fwnode_get_args_count(device, nargs_prop);
>
> that is exactly what I asked to drop as it's included in the
> acpi_fwnode_get_args_count() already, i.e. no need to check this in
> the caller and in the callee.
>
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > return ret;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list