[PATCH v7 15/24] ACPI: property: Add support for cells property
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Wed Jul 2 04:37:57 PDT 2025
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:20:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 7:16 AM Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
...
> > static int acpi_fwnode_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > const char *propname, const char *nargs_prop,
> > unsigned int args_count, unsigned int index,
> > const struct acpi_device_data *data;
> > struct fwnode_handle *ref_fwnode;
> > struct acpi_device *device;
> > + unsigned int nargs_count;
> > int ret, idx = 0;
> > + nargs_count = acpi_fwnode_get_args_count(device, nargs_prop);
>
> I think it should work the same way as it used to for the callers that
> pass args_count, so maybe
>
> if (!args_count)
> args_count = acpi_fwnode_get_args_count(device, nargs_prop);
But this is different variable.
> > element++;
> > -
> > ret = acpi_get_ref_args(idx == index ? args : NULL,
> > acpi_fwnode_handle(device),
> > - &element, end, args_count);
> > + &element, end,
> > + nargs_count ? nargs_count : args_count);
>
> And this change would not be necessary?
This is not the same check as proposed above.
But this can be made shorter with Elvis in use:
&element, end, nargs_count ?: args_count);
> And analogously below.
And below. And in case if there is a new proposal to have
if (!nargs_count)
args_count = acpi_fwnode_get_args_count(device, nargs_prop);
that is exactly what I asked to drop as it's included in the
acpi_fwnode_get_args_count() already, i.e. no need to check this in
the caller and in the callee.
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
...
> > if (!ref_fwnode)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + device = to_acpi_device_node(ref_fwnode);
> > + nargs_count = acpi_fwnode_get_args_count(device, nargs_prop);
> > element++;
> > -
> > ret = acpi_get_ref_args(idx == index ? args : NULL,
> > ref_fwnode, &element, end,
> > - args_count);
> > + nargs_count ? nargs_count : args_count);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list