[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Add regulators child

[Conor Dooley]

On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 12:46:53AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 12:36 AM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 23:07:29 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > From: Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org>
> > >
> > > Some sunxi SoCs have in-package regulators controlled by a register in
> > > the system control MMIO block. Allow a child node for this regulator
> > > device in addition to SRAM child nodes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml   | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > >
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> >
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> >
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.example.dtb: syscon at 3000000: regulators at 3000150: False schema does not allow {'compatible': ['allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos'], 'reg': [[50331984, 4]], 'ldoa': {'regulator-min-microvolt': [[1800000]], 'regulator-max-microvolt': [[1800000]]}, 'ldob': {'regulator-name': ['vcc-dram'], 'regulator-min-microvolt': [[1500000]], 'regulator-max-microvolt': [[1500000]]}}
> >         from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml#
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.example.dtb: /example-1/syscon at 3000000/regulators at 3000150: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos']
> 
> I'm not seeing this error locally. The binding in question for
> 'allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos' was merged in v6.10-rc1 in commit
> 622bab188484 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add Allwinner D1 system LDOs").

I only tried on top of linux-next from a few days ago, but it didn't
reproduce for me there. I think you're okay.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240623/f614867a/attachment.sig>