[PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: fix the comment for ISA string workaround
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Sat Jul 22 04:28:40 PDT 2023
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 08:22:25PM +0900, Tsukasa OI wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/07/22 19:52, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 06:22:38AM +0000, Tsukasa OI wrote:
> >> From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio at irq.a4lg.com>
> >>
> >> Extensions prefixed with "Su" won't corrupt the workaround in many
> >> cases. The only exception is when the first multi-letter extension in the
> >> ISA string begins with "Su" and is not prefixed with an underscore.
> >>
> >> For instance, following ISA string can confuse this QEMU workaround.
> >>
> >> * "rv64imacsuclic" (RV64I + M + A + C + "Suclic")
> >>
> >> However, this case is very unlikely because extensions prefixed by either
> >> "Z", "Sm" or "Ss" will most likely precede first.
> >>
> >> For instance, the "Suclic" extension (draft as of now) will be placed after
> >> related "Smclic" and "Ssclic" extensions. It's also highly likely that
> >> other unprivileged extensions like "Zba" will precede.
> >>
> >> It's also possible to suppress the issue in the QEMU workaround with an
> >> underscore. Following ISA string won't confuse the QEMU workaround.
> >>
> >> * "rv64imac_suclic" (RV64I + M + A + C + delimited "Suclic")
> >>
> >> This fix is to tell kernel developers the nature of this workaround
> >> precisely. There are some "Su*" extensions to be ratified but don't worry
> >> about this workaround too much.
> >>
> >
> >> This commit comes with another minor editorial fix.
> >
> > Which is what?
> >
> > The new wording is fine by me though..
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>
> 1. Use of plurals ("letters" and "bits")
> 2. Second "'s' & 'u'" to "'s' and 'u'"
> 3. Spacing after the first "'s' & 'u'" (before "(QEMU).")
>
> It feels they are too minor to separate to another commit.
> At least I should replace the commit message to "other minor editorial
> fixes" and... should I clarify editorial fixes?
I dunno, I just wasn't sure what you meant.
> >> + * Workaround for invalid single-letters 's' & 'u' (QEMU).
> >> + * No need to set the bits in riscv_isa as 's' and 'u' are
> >> + * not valid ISA extensions. It works unless the first multi-letter
> >> + * extension in the ISA string begins with "Su" and not prefixed
Re-reading I noticed this should be "is not prefixed".
> >> + * with an underscore.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230722/1f892a5a/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list