[PATCH v1 0/2] Add ethernet nodes for StarFive JH7110 SoC

[Conor Dooley]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 03:27:33PM +0800, Guo Samin wrote:

> -------- 原始信息 --------
> 主题: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add ethernet nodes for StarFive JH7110 SoC
> From: Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org>

> 收件人: Guo Samin <samin.guo at starfivetech.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley at sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>, Albert Ou <aou at eecs.berkeley.edu>, Hal Feng <hal.feng at starfivetech.com>, linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org, devicetree at vger.kernel.org, netdev at vger.kernel.org
> 日期: 2023/7/21

btw, please try and remove this stuff from your mails.

> > On 21 July 2023 03:09:19 IST, Guo Samin <samin.guo at starfivetech.com> wrote:

> >> There is a question about the configuration of phy that I would like to consult you.
> >>
> >> Latest on motorcomm PHY V5[1]: Follow Rob Herring's advice
> >> motorcomm,rx-xxx-driver-strength Changed to motorcomm,rx-xxx-drv-microamp .
> >> V5 has already received a reviewed-by from Andrew Lunn, and it should not change again.
> >>
> >> Should I submit another pacthes based on riscv-dt-for-next? 
> > 
> > Huh, dtbs_check passed for these patches,
> > I didn't realise changes to the motorcomm stuff
> > were a dep. for this. I'll take a look later.

> After discussing with HAL, I have prepared the code and considered adding the following patch to 
> Motorcomm's patchsetes v6. (To fix some spelling errors in v5[1])
> which will then send patches based on linux-next. What do you think? @Andrew @Conor

I think you are better off just sending the dts patch to me, adding a
dts patch that will not apply to net-next to your motorcomm driver series
will only really cause problems for the netdev patchwork automation.

> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20230720111509.21843-1-samin.guo@starfivetech.com

I meant to ack this yesterday, but it wasn't in my dt-binding review
queue. I'll go do that now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230721/f35579ed/attachment.sig>