[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: spi: constrain minItems of clocks and clock-names
William Qiu
william.qiu at starfivetech.com
Mon Jul 17 23:06:01 PDT 2023
On 2023/7/14 19:52, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 03:14:59PM +0800, William Qiu wrote:
>> On 2023/7/13 22:57, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> > I suspect that PCLK and SSPCLK are tied to the same clock source. There
>> > must be an SSPCLK because that is the one used to clock the SPI bus and
>> > we need to know the frequency of it.
>
>> After communicating with colleagues in SoC FE, I learned that PCLK and
>> SSPCLK were homologous on JH7110. He said that SSPCLK would divide the
>> frequency internally anyway, and there was no need for external part frequency,
>> so he directly gave them together.
>
>> So, should I call this clock ssp_apb or keep it SSPCLK?
>
> I'd expect this to be handled in the DTS for the SoC - connect both
> clocks the binding requires to whatever the upstream clock is, it's not
> clear to me that any binding change is required.
You mean binding two clocks, with the same clock source? Then there is no
need to modify YAML.
Best regards,
William
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list