[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: spi: constrain minItems of clocks and clock-names

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 03:14:59PM +0800, William Qiu wrote:
> On 2023/7/13 22:57, Rob Herring wrote:

> > I suspect that PCLK and SSPCLK are tied to the same clock source. There 
> > must be an SSPCLK because that is the one used to clock the SPI bus and 
> > we need to know the frequency of it.

> After communicating with colleagues in SoC FE, I learned that PCLK and
> SSPCLK were homologous on JH7110. He said that SSPCLK would divide the
> frequency internally anyway, and there was no need for external part frequency,
> so he directly gave them together.

> So, should I call this clock ssp_apb or keep it SSPCLK?

I'd expect this to be handled in the DTS for the SoC - connect both
clocks the binding requires to whatever the upstream clock is, it's not
clear to me that any binding change is required.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230714/8cfd31d6/attachment.sig>