Unexpected issues with 2 NVME initiators using the same target

Marta Rybczynska mrybczyn at kalray.eu
Wed May 17 05:56:36 PDT 2017


> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 07:59:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 05:36:32PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> > I understand you and both Max and me are feeling the same as you. For more
>> > than 2 months, we constantly (almost on daily basis) asked for a solution from
>> > architecture group, but received different answers. The proposals were
>> > extremely broad from need for strong fence for all cards to no need for
>> > strong fence at all.
>>
>> So let's get the patch to do a strong fence everywhere now, and relax
>> it later where possible.
>>
>> Correntness before speed..
> 
> OK, please give me and Max till EOW to stop this saga. One of the two
> options will be: Max will resend original patch, or Max will send patch
> blessed by architecture group.
> 

Good luck with this Max & Leon! It seems to be a complicated problem.
Just an idea: in our case it *seems* that the problem started appearing
after a firmware upgrade, older ones do not seem to have the same
behaviour. Maybe it's a hint for you.

Thanks!
Marta



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list