Unexpected issues with 2 NVME initiators using the same target

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 07:59:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 05:36:32PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > I understand you and both Max and me are feeling the same as you. For more
> > than 2 months, we constantly (almost on daily basis) asked for a solution from
> > architecture group, but received different answers. The proposals were
> > extremely broad from need for strong fence for all cards to no need for
> > strong fence at all.
>
> So let's get the patch to do a strong fence everywhere now, and relax
> it later where possible.
>
> Correntness before speed..

OK, please give me and Max till EOW to stop this saga. One of the two
options will be: Max will resend original patch, or Max will send patch
blessed by architecture group.

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/attachments/20170515/eda44767/attachment.sig>