bjorn.wesen at axis.com
Fri May 19 12:40:29 EDT 2000
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I guess we'll have to maintain 3 cvs trees instead of one :) or maybe the
> > 2.2 and 2.3 versions will be sufficiently similar to work with #ifdef's ?
> The 2.2 version will be merged into the MTD cvs tree.
> Sébastien Côté <scote1 at matrox.com> is working on it. The changes are
> sufficiently small to warrant #ifdef's.
> For the 2.0 version.... I don't know. Maybe if we just keep two separate
> inode.c in the tree. That file is the only one with changes, but they are
> quite major.
That sounds good. As long as the internal routines are the same, it will
make bugfixing etc easier if they coexist.
So we'll merge in the inode.c from the MTD tree when you've merged in the
2.2 patches, and then we'll do some magic incantations and make a real
JFFS release as an all-purpose patch :)
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org
More information about the linux-mtd