aviro at redhat.com
Fri May 19 12:37:43 EDT 2000
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2000, Bjorn Wesen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > do you think there is any possibility at all to make the same source of
> > JFFS work both in 2.0, 2.2 and 2.3/4 ? It is not really good to split the
> > development into 3 branches I think, but it sure looks like it will be
> > difficult to merge together Alexander's 2.3 port with our original
> > 2.0 version.
> > I guess we'll have to maintain 3 cvs trees instead of one :) or maybe the
> > 2.2 and 2.3 versions will be sufficiently similar to work with #ifdef's ?
> The 2.2 version will be merged into the MTD cvs tree.
> Sébastien Côté <scote1 at matrox.com> is working on it. The changes are
> sufficiently small to warrant #ifdef's.
Notice that 2.3 and 2.2 versions will seriously diverge in interp.c too -
current code maintains the heck of redundant stuff that already belongs
to dcache. And I'm not too sure that cleanups in that area will be portable
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org
More information about the linux-mtd