rename semantics

Alexander Larsson alex at
Fri May 19 12:32:33 EDT 2000

On Fri, 19 May 2000, Bjorn Wesen wrote:

> Hi,
> do you think there is any possibility at all to make the same source of
> JFFS work both in 2.0, 2.2 and 2.3/4 ? It is not really good to split the
> development into 3 branches I think, but it sure looks like it will be
> difficult to merge together Alexander's 2.3 port with our original
> 2.0 version. 
> I guess we'll have to maintain 3 cvs trees instead of one :) or maybe the
> 2.2 and 2.3 versions will be sufficiently similar to work with #ifdef's ? 

The 2.2 version will be merged into the MTD cvs tree. 
Sébastien Côté <scote1 at> is working on it. The changes are
sufficiently small to warrant #ifdef's. 

For the 2.0 version.... I don't know. Maybe if we just keep two separate
inode.c in the tree. That file is the only one with changes, but they are
quite major.

/ Alex

To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at

More information about the linux-mtd mailing list