[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board

[Sherry Sun]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 21/01/2026 11:51, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>>>> +              - fsl,imx93w-evk            # i.MX93W EVK Board
> >>>>> Is 93w 11x11 or 14x14? can you add suffix to keep align existing one.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Hi Frank,
> >>>>
> >>>> IMX93W-EVK is the official board name, it basically reuse the
> >>>> i.MX93
> >>>> 11x11 EVK board, as described in the cover letter and dts patch. I
> >>>> prefer to still use this name (imx93w-evk) to keep align with the
> >>>> board
> >>> official name.
> >>> It's second case, previous was frdm, with the same argument. I don't
> >>> care what you prefer internally. You must align to upstream and all
> >>> NXP boards are called soc-foo. Not socfoo.
> >> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>
> >> The soc name is imx93w, the board is basically reuse the i.MX93 11x11
> >> EVK, so do you suggest we name it fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk or fsl,imx93w-
> evk?
> > As per my understanding from Krzysztof comment this should be  fsl,imx93-
> w-evk.
> > Like soc-foo not socfoo.
> If the soc is "imx93w", the physical size / variant is "11x11" and the board is
> "evk", then I'd define compatible as "fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk", "fsl,imx93w",
> "fsl,imx93".

Hi Josua,
Thanks for the suggestion, "fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk", "fsl,imx93w", "fsl,imx93" 
compatible seems more reasonable.

Best Regards
Sherry