[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Wed Jan 21 01:57:01 PST 2026


On 21/01/2026 09:05, Sherry Sun wrote:
> 
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
>>
>> On 21/01/2026 04:18, Sherry Sun wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 06:26:03PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
>>>>> Add DT compatible string for NXP i.MX93W EVK board.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun at nxp.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>>> index 93ad6f0027d0..1769f243d70f 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>>> @@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>                - fsl,imx93-11x11-evk       # i.MX93 11x11 EVK Board
>>>>>                - fsl,imx93-11x11-frdm      # i.MX93 11x11 FRDM Board
>>>>>                - fsl,imx93-14x14-evk       # i.MX93 14x14 EVK Board
>>>>> +              - fsl,imx93w-evk            # i.MX93W EVK Board
>>>>
>>>> Is 93w 11x11 or 14x14? can you add suffix to keep align existing one.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Frank,
>>>
>>> IMX93W-EVK is the official board name, it basically reuse the  i.MX93
>>> 11x11 EVK board, as described in the cover letter and dts patch. I
>>> prefer to still use this name (imx93w-evk) to keep align with the board
>> official name.
>> It's second case, previous was frdm, with the same argument. I don't care
>> what you prefer internally. You must align to upstream and all NXP boards are
>> called soc-foo. Not socfoo.
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> The soc name is imx93w, the board is basically reuse the i.MX93 11x11 EVK,
> so do you suggest we name it fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk or fsl,imx93w-evk?

If SoC is imx93w then your compatible is wrong. It clearly says imx93
(no "w").

Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list