[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board

[Sherry Sun]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
> 
> On 21/01/2026 04:18, Sherry Sun wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 06:26:03PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> >>> Add DT compatible string for NXP i.MX93W EVK board.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun at nxp.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> >>> index 93ad6f0027d0..1769f243d70f 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> >>> @@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ properties:
> >>>                - fsl,imx93-11x11-evk       # i.MX93 11x11 EVK Board
> >>>                - fsl,imx93-11x11-frdm      # i.MX93 11x11 FRDM Board
> >>>                - fsl,imx93-14x14-evk       # i.MX93 14x14 EVK Board
> >>> +              - fsl,imx93w-evk            # i.MX93W EVK Board
> >>
> >> Is 93w 11x11 or 14x14? can you add suffix to keep align existing one.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > IMX93W-EVK is the official board name, it basically reuse the  i.MX93
> > 11x11 EVK board, as described in the cover letter and dts patch. I
> > prefer to still use this name (imx93w-evk) to keep align with the board
> official name.
> It's second case, previous was frdm, with the same argument. I don't care
> what you prefer internally. You must align to upstream and all NXP boards are
> called soc-foo. Not socfoo.

Hi Krzysztof,

The soc name is imx93w, the board is basically reuse the i.MX93 11x11 EVK,
so do you suggest we name it fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk or fsl,imx93w-evk?

Best Regards
Sherry