[PATCH v3 3/3] spi: xilinx: use device property accessors.
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Mon Jan 19 09:32:13 PST 2026
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 09:15:40AM -0800, Abdurrahman Hussain wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 2026, at 8:50 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 08:47:17AM -0800, Abdurrahman Hussain wrote:
> >>> Are these bindings appropraite for ACPI systems?
> >> Yes, the Xilinx IP blocks are memory mapped and work exactly the same on ACPI as they do on DT.
> > That does not answer the question at all. Is it appropriate to
> > configure an ACPI system in this way?
> I am not sure I understood your question. What do you mean by “appropriate”?
> This is following the same guidelines as outlined in
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.7/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.html
You are just bindly making the DT properties available as _DSD
properties on ACPI systems, ACPI is a completely different firmware
interface with it's own idioms. Does this interface make any sense on
ACPI?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20260119/00092915/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list