[PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l-evm: Disable MMC0 internal pulls
Judith Mendez
jm at ti.com
Mon Feb 23 12:15:47 PST 2026
Hello Moteen,
On 2/20/26 2:57 AM, Moteen Shah wrote:
> Hey Judith,
>
> On 13/02/26 00:12, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> AM62L EVM has external pullups on MMC0 CMD and D0 pins [0]. Remove
>> internal pullups considering:
>> - having both internal and external pullups reduces the total pull-up
>> resistance < 47K resulting in a value below the spec recommended
>> 50K ohms
>> - having both pullups results in unnecessary power consumption
>>
>> Fixes: 00fb4c73b67d ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l: add initial reference
>> board file")
>> [0] https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/SPRCAL6
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm at ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dts | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/
>> boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dts
>> index cae04cce33736..5085cd255fcd5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dts
>> @@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ AM62LX_IOPAD(0x01e0, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (D8)
>> I2C2_SDA */
>> mmc0_pins_default: mmc0-default-pins {
>> pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> - AM62LX_IOPAD(0x0214, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (D2)
>> MMC0_CMD */
>> + AM62LX_IOPAD(0x0214, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D2) MMC0_CMD */
>> AM62LX_IOPAD(0x020c, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (B2) MMC0_CLK */
>> - AM62LX_IOPAD(0x0208, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (D3)
>> MMC0_DAT0 */
>> + AM62LX_IOPAD(0x0208, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D3) MMC0_DAT0 */
>> AM62LX_IOPAD(0x0204, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (D4)
>> MMC0_DAT1 */
>> AM62LX_IOPAD(0x0200, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (C1)
>> MMC0_DAT2 */
>> AM62LX_IOPAD(0x01fc, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (C2)
>> MMC0_DAT3 */
>
>
> Wont the change result in mismatched pullup resistance and will the
> mismatch between D0 and D1-D3 won't cause potential timing issues for
> modes with tighter timing requirements?
If you leave the internal pullup on MMC0_DAT0, then you will have a
greater mismatch actually. But I noticed a wrong detail on the commit
description after reviewing the patches again. So will respin the
series, thanks for reviewing Moteen.
~ Judith
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list