[PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: avoid redundant conditions

[Viresh Kumar]

On 03-09-25, 20:12, Liao Yuanhong wrote:
> While 'if (i <= 0) ... else if (i > 0) ...' is technically equivalent to
> 'if (i <= 0) ... else ...', the latter is vastly easier to read because
> it avoids writing out a condition that is unnecessary. Let's drop such
> unnecessary conditions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong at vivo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> index fae062a6431f..00de1166188a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
>  						      soc_data->sram_max_volt);
>  				return ret;
>  			}
> -		} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
> +		} else {
>  			vproc = max(new_vproc,
>  				    pre_vsram - soc_data->max_volt_shift);
>  			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh