[PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: avoid redundant conditions

[Liao Yuanhong]

While 'if (i <= 0) ... else if (i > 0) ...' is technically equivalent to
'if (i <= 0) ... else ...', the latter is vastly easier to read because
it avoids writing out a condition that is unnecessary. Let's drop such
unnecessary conditions.

Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong at vivo.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
index fae062a6431f..00de1166188a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 						      soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
+		} else {
 			vproc = max(new_vproc,
 				    pre_vsram - soc_data->max_volt_shift);
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
-- 
2.34.1