[PATCH v2 2/3] pinctrl: qcom: sm8350-lpass-lpi: add SM8350 LPASS TLMM
Konrad Dybcio
konrad.dybcio at linaro.org
Thu Jul 20 00:38:28 PDT 2023
On 19.07.2023 21:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/06/2023 14:12, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 19.06.2023 11:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Add driver for pin controller in Low Power Audio SubSystem (LPASS). The
>>> driver is similar to SM8250 LPASS pin controller, with difference in one
>>> new pin (gpio14).
>>>
>
>
>
>> < LPI_MUX_swr_tx_data2,
>> 54d52
>> < static int gpio14_pins[] = { 14 };
>> 71d68
>> < PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
>> 75c72
>> < static const char * const swr_tx_data_groups[] = { "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio5", "gpio14" };
>> ---
>>> static const char * const swr_tx_data_groups[] = { "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio5" };
>> 111d107
>> < LPI_PINGROUP(14, 6, swr_rx_data, _, _, _),
>>
>>
>>
>> I really think adding just these pin14 entries to the 8250 driver would
>> be a good idea..
>>
>
>
> I could extend arrays with gpio14 and pass array size -1 to sm8250
> variant and full size to sm8350. However the difference will be in:
>
> -static const char * const swr_tx_data_groups[] = { "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio5" };
> +static const char * const swr_tx_data_groups[] = { "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio5", "gpio14" };
>
> I cannot create here variant "swr_tx_data_groups_sm8350" because the
> name is used in macros. Using bigger (with gpio14) group for sm8250
> should work, because there is no gpio14, but produces difference in the
> controller:
>
> -/sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/33c0000.pinctrl/pinmux-functions:function 18: swr_tx_data, groups = [ gpio1 gpio2 gpio5 ]
> +/sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/33c0000.pinctrl/pinmux-functions:function 18: swr_tx_data, groups = [ gpio1 gpio2 gpio5 gpio14 ]
>
> Therefore I will go with separate drivers.
Ack
Konrad
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list