[PATCH v4 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add USB related nodes
Varadarajan Narayanan
quic_varada at quicinc.com
Wed Jul 12 21:14:40 PDT 2023
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:28:43PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 12/07/2023 15:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >On 12/07/2023 13:38, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> >>Add USB phy and controller nodes.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada at quicinc.com>
> >>---
> >>v4:
> >> Change node name
> >> Remove blank line
> >> 'make CHECK_DTBS=y DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qcom qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dtb' passed
> >>v1:
> >> Rename phy node
> >> Change compatible from m31,ipq5332-usb-hsphy -> qcom,ipq5332-usb-hsphy
> >> Remove 'qscratch' from phy node
> >> Fix alignment and upper-case hex no.s
> >> Add clock definition for the phy
> >> Remove snps,ref-clock-period-ns as it is not used. dwc3_ref_clk_period()
> >> in dwc3/core.c takes the frequency from ref clock and calculates fladj
> >> as appropriate.
> >>---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi
> >>index 8bfc2db..8118356 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi
> >>@@ -405,6 +405,59 @@
> >> status = "disabled";
> >> };
> >> };
> >>+
> >>+ usbphy0: usb-phy at 7b000 {
> >>+ compatible = "qcom,ipq5332-usb-hsphy";
> >>+ reg = <0x0007b000 0x12c>;
> >>+
> >>+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>;
> >>+ clock-names = "cfg_ahb";
> >>+
> >>+ resets = <&gcc GCC_QUSB2_0_PHY_BCR>;
> >>+
> >>+ status = "disabled";
> >>+ };
> >>+
> >>+ usb2: usb2 at 8a00000 {
> >
> >So you responded to my comments, wait ten minutes and send v2? No need
> >to wait for my feedback, right?
> >
> >No, it's not ok. This is "usb", not "usb2". Are you saying you have
> >second device with the same address?
>
> Just to emphasise, it's the node name `usb2', which is not fine. DT label
> `usb2' is (hopefully) fine.
Thanks for the clarification. Will post a new patch.
-Varada
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list