[PATCH v7 2/8] KVM: Introduce __kvm_follow_pfn function
David Stevens
stevensd at chromium.org
Wed Jul 5 22:52:55 PDT 2023
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 10:34 AM Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 04:50:47PM +0900,
> David Stevens <stevensd at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd at chromium.org>
> >
> > Introduce __kvm_follow_pfn, which will replace __gfn_to_pfn_memslot.
> > __kvm_follow_pfn refactors the old API's arguments into a struct and,
> > where possible, combines the boolean arguments into a single flags
> > argument.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd at chromium.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 16 ++++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h | 3 +-
> > virt/kvm/pfncache.c | 8 +-
> > 4 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 9d3ac7720da9..ef2763c2b12e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
> > #define KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON (KVM_PFN_ERR_MASK + 1)
> > #define KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT (KVM_PFN_ERR_MASK + 2)
> > #define KVM_PFN_ERR_SIGPENDING (KVM_PFN_ERR_MASK + 3)
> > +#define KVM_PFN_ERR_NEEDS_IO (KVM_PFN_ERR_MASK + 4)
> >
> > /*
> > * error pfns indicate that the gfn is in slot but faild to
> > @@ -1156,6 +1157,21 @@ unsigned long gfn_to_hva_memslot_prot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> > void kvm_release_page_clean(struct page *page);
> > void kvm_release_page_dirty(struct page *page);
> >
> > +struct kvm_follow_pfn {
> > + const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> > + gfn_t gfn;
> > + unsigned int flags;
> > + bool atomic;
> > + /* Allow a read fault to create a writeable mapping. */
> > + bool allow_write_mapping;
>
> Maybe, make them const for input arguments?
Unfortunately using const isn't straightforward as long as the kernel
continues to use -Wdeclaration-after-statement. If these fields were
const, then they would need to be specified in the initializer when
declaring the variable, but that's not necessarily always possible.
-David
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list