[PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195-mt6359: Use snd_soc_pm_ops instead of custom ops
Tzung-Bi Shih
tzungbi at kernel.org
Thu Sep 22 04:26:21 PDT 2022
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:35:02PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> -static const struct dev_pm_ops mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops = {
> - .poweroff = snd_soc_poweroff,
> - .restore = snd_soc_resume,
> -};
> -
> static struct platform_driver mt8195_mt6359_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "mt8195_mt6359",
> .of_match_table = mt8195_mt6359_dt_match,
> - .pm = &mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops,
> + .pm = &snd_soc_pm_ops,
snd_soc_pm_ops[1] sets some more fields. I'm not quite sure whether
it would introduce any side effect or not. Perhaps Trevor could
provide some suggestions.
[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19.10/source/sound/soc/soc-core.c#L2150
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list