[PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195-mt6359: Use snd_soc_pm_ops instead of custom ops

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Thu Sep 22 03:35:02 PDT 2022


It is possible to use the standard snd_soc_pm_ops for this card:
remove the custom mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
---
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c
index 961e769602d6..23bdde6acd1c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c
@@ -1532,16 +1532,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id mt8195_mt6359_dt_match[] = {
 	{},
 };
 
-static const struct dev_pm_ops mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops = {
-	.poweroff = snd_soc_poweroff,
-	.restore = snd_soc_resume,
-};
-
 static struct platform_driver mt8195_mt6359_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "mt8195_mt6359",
 		.of_match_table = mt8195_mt6359_dt_match,
-		.pm = &mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops,
+		.pm = &snd_soc_pm_ops,
 	},
 	.probe = mt8195_mt6359_dev_probe,
 };
-- 
2.37.2




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list