[PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
cgel.zte at gmail.com
cgel.zte at gmail.com
Sun Apr 17 23:30:59 PDT 2022
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci at zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
---
drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
index 7bab4bbaf02d..ce09c42eaed2 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
@@ -555,11 +555,9 @@ static int am33xx_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto err_pm_runtime_disable;
- }
ret = pm_ops->init(am33xx_do_sram_idle);
if (ret) {
--
2.25.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list