[PATCH] soc: imx: gpcv2: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte at gmail.com]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci at zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c b/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
index 3cb123016b3e..4f445889a9e8 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
@@ -224,11 +224,9 @@ static int imx_pgc_power_up(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	u32 reg_val, pgc;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(domain->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(domain->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(domain->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	if (!IS_ERR(domain->regulator)) {
 		ret = regulator_enable(domain->regulator);
@@ -987,11 +985,9 @@ static int imx_pgc_domain_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	 * after resume, without tripping over our usage of runtime PM to
 	 * power up/down the nested domains.
 	 */
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.25.1