[PATCH 31/33] ARM i.MX5: implement clocks using common clock framework

Heiko Stübner heiko at sntech.de
Thu Apr 26 10:21:26 EDT 2012


Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2012, 15:02:22 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:48:00PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> > 
> > more out of curiosity, why is the i.MX50 always excluded. Is it so vastly
> > different to the MX51 and MX53?
> 
> I don't think that it's so different. I think the reason is that the
> i.MX50 is not widely used outside of some special applications. At least
> we have no customers using it.

yeah, I started working on one of those "special applications" :-) .Currently 
based on the freescale tree, where the mx50 seems to have its own clock file. 

So, it seems I'll take a look myself to see what is missing/different.


Heiko



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list